Photosynthetica 1999, 36(3):471-476 | DOI: 10.1023/A:1007040506838

Ecophysiological Responses to Neighbor Removal in an Old-Field and a Prairie in Northeastern Kansas, USA

F. Norman, C.E. Martin

An ecophysiological approach was used to determine if competition can be detected among plants in a recently abandoned old-field and in a native tallgrass prairie in northeastern Kansas. In situ photosynthetic parameters and water potentials (Ψ) of target plants were measured 1-2 d after neighbor (intra- and interspecific) removal as well as 1-4 weeks later, and compared with values for plants with neighbors. Only two of the six study species (four old-field and two prairie species) responded to removal of neighboring plants, and only after several weeks had elapsed. Net photosynthetic rates (PN) and stomatal conductances (gs) of Ambrosia trifida in an old-field increased after removal of both intra- and interspecific neighbors. For Apocynum cannabinum, another old-field species, PN of target plants without neighbors was significantly higher than that of target plants with neighbors. For both these species, values of Ψ were not different between target plants with and without neighbors, suggesting that increased availability of nutrients may have been responsible for the observed ecophysiological responses. Though numerous past studies indicate that competition is a major factor influencing plants in old-field and in prairie communities, the experimental approach used in this study revealed that neighbor removal had only limited effects on ecophysiology of the target plants in either community.

Additional key words: Ambrosia trifida; Apocynum cannabinum; Aster pilosus; competition; Eryngium yuccifolium; Lespedeza capitata; photosynthesis; Solidago canadensis; stomatal conductance; water potential

Published: August 1, 1999  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Norman, F., & Martin, C.E. (1999). Ecophysiological Responses to Neighbor Removal in an Old-Field and a Prairie in Northeastern Kansas, USA. Photosynthetica, 36(3), 471-476. doi: 10.1023/A:1007040506838
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allen, E.B., Forman, R.T.T.: Plant species removals and old-field community structure and stability.-Ecology 57: 1233-1243, 1976. Go to original source...
    2. Armesto, J.J., Pickett, S.T.A.: Removal experiments to test mechanisms of plant succession in old fields.-Vegetatio 66: 85-93, 1986. Go to original source...
    3. Bowman, D.M.J.S., Kirkpatrick, J.B.: Establishment, suppression and growth of Eucalyptus delegatensis R.T. Baker in multiaged forests. III. Intraspecific allelopathy, competition between adult and juvenile for moisture and nutrients, and frost damage to seedlings.-Aust. J. Bot. 34: 81-94, 1986. Go to original source...
    4. Clements, F.E., Weaver, J.E., Hanson, H.C.: Plant Competition. An Analysis of Community Functions.-Carnegie Inst. Wash., Washington 1929.
    5. D'Antonio, C.M., Mahall, B.E.: Root profiles and competition between the invasive, exotic perennial, Carpobrotus edulis, and two native shrub species in California coastal scrub.-Amer. J. Bot. 78: 885-894, 1991. Go to original source...
    6. Dwyer, D.D.: Competition between forbs and grasses.-J. Range Manage. 11: 115-118, 1958. Go to original source...
    7. Ehleringer, J.R.: Intraspecific competitive effects on water relations, growth and reproduction in Encelia farinosa.-Oecologia 63: 153-158, 1984. Go to original source...
    8. Fonteyn, P.J., Mahall, B.E.: Competition among desert perennials.-Nature 275: 544-545, 1978. Go to original source...
    9. Fonteyn, P.J., Mahall, B.E.: An experimental analysis of structure in a desert plant community.-J. Ecol. 69: 883-896, 1981. Go to original source...
    10. Fowler, N.: The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions.-Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 89-110, 1986. Go to original source...
    11. Gibson, D.J., Skeel, V.A.: Effects of competition on photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of Sorghastrum nutans.-Photosynthetica 32: 503-512, 1996.
    12. Goldberg, D.E.: Neighborhood competition in an old-field plant community.-Ecology 68: 1211-1223, 1987. Go to original source...
    13. Goldberg, D.E., Barton, A.M.: Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: A review of field experiments with plants.-Amer. Naturalist 139: 771-801, 1992. Go to original source...
    14. Hartnett, D.C.: Regulation of clonal growth and dynamics of Panicum virgatum (Poaceae) in tallgrass prairie: Effects of neighbor removal and nutrient addition.-Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1114-1120, 1993. Go to original source...
    15. Holmgren, M., Scheffer, M., Huston, M.A.: The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities.-Ecology 78: 1966-1975, 1997. Go to original source...
    16. Miller, T.E., Werner, P.A.: Competitive effects and responses between plant species in a first-year old-field community.-Ecology 68: 1201-1210, 1987. Go to original source...
    17. Norman, F., Martin, C.E.: Growth, photosynthesis, water relations and competition of the old-field species Abutilon theophrasti, Ambrosia trifida, and Helianthus annuus grown under controlled conditions.-Photosynthetica 30: 361-371, 1994.
    18. Norman, F.J.: Plant Ecophysiology and Competition in Old-Field and Prairie Communities.-Masters Thesis. University of Kansas, Lawrence 1989.
    19. Pinder, J.E., III: Effects of species removal on an old-field plant community.-Ecology 56: 747-751, 1975. Go to original source...
    20. Price, D.T., Black, T.A., Kelliher, F.M.: Effects of salal understory removal on photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of young Douglas-fir trees.-Can. J. Forest Res. 16: 90-97, 1986. Go to original source...
    21. Rice, E.L.: Allelopathy.-Academic Press, New York 1974.
    22. Robberecht, R., Mahall, B.E., Nobel, P.S.: Experimental removal of intraspecific competitors - effects on water relations and productivity of a desert bunchgrass, Hilaria rigida.-Oecologia 60: 21-24, 1983. Go to original source...
    23. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J.: Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 2nd Ed.-W. H. Freeman and Co., New York 1981.
    24. Sucoff, E., Hong, S.G.: Effects of thinning on needle water potential in red pine.-Forest Sci. 20: 25-29, 1974.
    25. Tilman, D.: Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats.-Ecology 75: 2-16, 1994. Go to original source...
    26. Van Auken, O.W., Bush, J.K., Diamond, D.D.: Changes in growth of two C4 grasses (Schizachyrium scoparium and Paspalum plicatulum) in monoculture and mixture: Influence of soil depth.-Amer. J. Bot. 81: 15-20, 1994. Go to original source...
    27. Wang, J.R., Simard, S.W., Kimmins, J.P.: Physiological responses of paper birch to thinning in British Columbia.-Forest Ecol. Manage. 73: 177-184, 1995. Go to original source...
    28. Wedin, D., Tilman, D.: Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient. Initial conditions and mechanisms of competition.-Ecol. Monogr. 63: 199-229, 1993. Go to original source...
    29. Wilson, S.D., Tilman, D.: Competitive responses of eight old-field plant species in four environments.-Ecology 76: 1169-1180, 1995. Go to original source...

    Return to the content